Nagel
4:17 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
This thing of waiting til a break in play before blowing the final whistle - if it was used in conjunction with a 30 min per half rule then players would know when time is up and a side defending a lead would surely just deliberately foul the opposition to end the game. If the ref plays on after that and allows the free kick then when does he stop?
|
Coffee
4:16 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
Any Old Iron 3:43 Sun Jun 18
On an emotional level, I agree with all that. But look at some of the rule changes that have come in over the years and the game is better for them, to be fair.
The back pass. Do you remember how fucking tedious the game had become with all those back passes? Was it Malcolm Allison when he was boss at Man City who banned his players from passing back to the keeper?
The change from one sub to three. I'd guess that most fans think that's an improvement.
|
AlvinMartinAllen
4:13 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
Other than video refs I don't think they should change anything. The game is long enough without them stopping and starting constantly which will increase if they know they aren't time wasting when the clock stops. Teams will also just look to waste the time on the clock somehow and make the game even worse. Stupid idea.
UEFA should change the European comps though. Straight knock out, no seeding. Only champions and cup winners. Quality over quantity. Greed CUNTS.
|
davese16
4:06 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
30 minutes each way, will we get 33% off our season tickets lol, keep it 45 minutes each way.
|
the coming of gary
3:56 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
referee to aerosol - spray the penalty spot where the foul took place
EACH PENALTY WILL BE DIFFERENT
|
Any Old Iron
3:43 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
The best, most played, and most watched team sport in the world that has been played under rules very similar to those drafted by the English Football Association in 1863 needs little, or no interference from a load of foreigners who don't have the best interests of the game at large in their thoughts.
The more they fuck about with technology the more the pro game becomes separated from the amateur game, and until recently that had never been the case.
The game should be the same whether it's played on the local park or Wembley stadium.
|
Sven Roeder
1:52 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
The 30 mins actual playing time via a time clock will still see each half lasting about 48 mins as most do now.
What it will stop is time wasting in the last part of a game ... i.e. Players dawdling off , taking 2 mins to get the ball for a goal kick or throw in etc
They should also formalise this thing of waiting til a break in play before blowing the final whistle.
Some refs do it now , waiting for a corner to be taken when time is up and then blowing the whistle if the ball is cleared
|
pdbis
1:50 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
90 minutes each way with 11 subs allowed.Now that would make things interesting.
|
kips
1:44 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
We have been playing 45 mins each way since 1869. In 1869 training involved doing a few press ups and squats. A mug of tea at half time and a fag.
130 years later professional footballers are super fit. There is no reason way it should not be 1 hour each way. Give the fans a bit more value for their money.
|
Brucies_Star_Prize
10:34 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
Timekeeping has been my biggest frustration with football for some time. This rule makes absolute sense and would be long overdue.
|
Spandex Sidney
10:15 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
To be honest, I'm a big fan of the video ref. Followed by a 6 match ban for those poncing a penalty.
That stops that OVERNIGHT.
|
PistonHammered
4:19 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
Post match penalties for divers and a record kept on offenders giving refs the right take previous into account when said player goes down.
The ref should not be the time keeper!! End of. Doesn't he have enough on his fucking plate? A time keeper who controls the stadium play clock is the way to do it.
Someone needs to time some games to calculate the average playing time during games. I would have thought 35 minutes per half was closer but maybe it is 30. For those of you who think you'd only be watching an hour game think again. The clock would stop for injuries yes but also throw ins, goal kicks, disputes, subs, free kicks and penalties.........if they do it right. Time wasting becomes a thing of the past and refs can't let a play carry on past the end of a game. West Ham have lost a few of their games because of this over the years.
Some of football's rules are archaic and just plain ridiculous and changes are needed.
|
Saul Bollox
2:56 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
- The referee can award a goal if a player stops a goal being scored by handling on or close to the goal-line.
I've been saying this since that Liverpool cunt McDermot stopped Alvin Martin's header with his hand, at the end of the League Cup final in 1981
Ghana were stopped from progressing to the semi final of the 2010 the World Cup by another cheating Liverpool cunt. Luis (Your teeth are offside) Suarez. Ghana missed the ensuing penalty and lost the shootout.
|
Sydney_Iron
1:36 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
They should do something to stop all the diving/Fein injury etc, think Sergio Ramos in the CL final, and if a player has obviously done so, a Red is issued in retrospect after the game, if the Ref misses it, and if another player has been sent off, there card is rescinded.
30 mins each way? fuck off, its 45 end of.........
|
delboy
1:27 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
leave the game alone, those in charge are ruining it
|
gph
1:11 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
Comma's right.
Period.
|
Sniper
12:54 Sun Jun 18
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
Technically shouldn't the clock be stopped when the ball is out of play anywa? Especially the penalty one - see us vs Spurs a few years back when kane missed and buried the rebound
Speaking of which, changing that law is Stupid - just abide by the current laws on keepers staying on the line and players not infringing.
I would like the see a goal awarded for a handball that prevents a goal - not a goal scoring opportunity but an actual goal like Suarez v Ghana. If the ball is actually going in and no one else can stop it, a penalty outs the attacking team in a far worse situation
|
Huffers
10:46 Sat Jun 17
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
The goal kick one is the best one Mad Dog. Stops goalkeepers time wasting by moving the ball about.
|
,
10:46 Sat Jun 17
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
Football does not need fresh or modified rules. Rather it needs the rules as exist to to be uniformly and consistently applied and the technology made available to apply those rules in crucial situations.
|
stewey
10:41 Sat Jun 17
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
Stopping the wwf antics at corners and free kicks
|
Mad Dog
10:00 Sat Jun 17
Re: Football rule reforms. Some interesting suggestions.
|
30 minutes. No
Stopping clock. Yes.
passing to yourself at a free-kick, corner and goal-kick. Yes
a stadium clock which stops and starts along with the referee's watch. Why not
Allowing the goal-kick to be taken even if the ball is moving. Yes
a goal-kick being taken on the same side that the ball went out on. What is the point?
a "clearer and more consistent definition" of handball. Fuck yes
player who scores a goal or stops a goal with his hands gets a red card. Yes
a keeper who handles a backpass or throw-in from a team-mate concedes a penalty. Yes
the referee can award a goal if a player stops a goal being scored by handling on or close to the goal-line. Yes
referees can only blow for half-time or full-time when the ball goes out of play. No.
a penalty kick is either scored or missed/saved and players cannot follow up to score to stop encroachment into the penalty area. No. Just enforce the existing rule.
|
| 
